Bookbinders
By William Blades
IN the first chapter I mentioned bookbinders among the Enemies of Books,
and I tremble to think what a stinging retort might be made if some
irate bibliopegist were to turn the scales on the printer, and place HIM
in the same category. On the sins of printers, and the unnatural
neglect which has often shortened the lives of their typographical
progeny, it is not for me to dilate. There is an old proverb, “ ‘Tis an
ill bird that befouls its own nest”; a curious chapter thereupon, with
many modern examples, might nevertheless be written. This I will leave,
and will now only place on record some of the cruelties perpetrated upon
books by the ignorance or carelessness of binders. Like men, books
have a soul and body. With the soul, or literary portion, we have
nothing to do at present; the body, which is the outer frame or
covering, and without which the inner would be unusable, is the special
work of the binder. He, so to speak, begets it; he determines its form
and adornment, he doctors it in disease and decay, and, not unseldom,
dissects it after death. Here, too, as through all Nature, we find the
good and bad running side by side. What a treat it is to handle a
well-bound volume; the leaves lie open fully and freely, as if tempting
you to read on, and you handle them without fear of their parting from
the back. To look at the “tooling,” too, is a pleasure, for careful
thought, combined with artistic skill, is everywhere apparent. You open
the cover and find the same loving attention inside that has been given
to the outside, all the workmanship being true and thorough. Indeed, so
conservative is a good binding, that many a worthless book has had an
honoured old age, simply out of respect to its outward aspect; and many
a real treasure has come to a degraded end and premature death through
the unsightliness of its outward case and the irreparable damage done to
it in binding.
The weapon with which the binder deals the most deadly blows to books
is the “plough,” the effect of which is to cut away the margins, placing
the print in a false position relatively to the back and head, and often
denuding the work of portions of the very text. This reduction in size
not seldom brings down a handsome folio to the size of quarto, and a
quarto to an octavo.
With the old hand plough a binder required more care and caution to
produce an even edge throughout than with the new cutting machine. If a
careless workman found that he had not ploughed the margin quite square
with the text, he would put it in his press and take off “another
shaving,” and sometimes even a third.
Dante, in his “Inferno,” deals out to the lost souls various tortures
suited with dramatic fitness to the past crimes of the victims, and had
I to execute judgment on the criminal binders of certain precious
volumes I have seen, where the untouched maiden sheets entrusted to
their care have, by barbarous treatment, lost dignity, beauty and value,
I would collect the paper shavings so ruthlessly shorn off, and roast
the perpetrator of the outrage over their slow combustion. In olden
times, before men had learned to value the relics of our printers, there
was some excuse for the sins of a binder who erred from ignorance which
was general; but in these times, when the historical and antiquarian
value of old books is freely acknowledged, no quarter should be granted
to a careless culprit.
It may be supposed that, from the spread of information, all real
danger from ignorance is past. Not so, good reader; that is a
consummation as yet “devoutly to be wished.”
Let me relate to you a true bibliographical anecdote:
In 1877, a certain lord, who had succeeded to a fine collection of
old books, promised to send some of the most valuable (among which were
several Caxtons) to the Exhibition at South Kensington. Thinking their
outward appearance too shabby, and not knowing the danger of his
conduct, he decided to have them rebound in the neighbouring county
town. The volumes were soon returned in a resplendent state, and, it is
said, quite to the satisfaction of his lordship, whose pleasure,
however, was sadly damped when a friend pointed out to him that,
although the discoloured edges had all been ploughed off, and the
time-stained blanks, with their fifteenth century autographs, had been
replaced by nice clean fly-leaves, yet, looking at the result in its
lowest aspect only— that of market value—the books had been damaged to
at least the amount of L500; and, moreover, that caustic remarks would
most certainly follow upon their public exhibition. Those poor injured
volumes were never sent.
Some years ago one of the most rare books printed by Machlinia— a
thin folio—was discovered bound in sheep by a country bookbinder, and
cut down to suit the size of some quarto tracts. But do not let us
suppose that country binders are the only culprits. It is not very long
since the discovery of a unique Caxton in one of our largest London
libraries. It was in boards, as originally issued by the
fifteenth-century binder, and a great fuss (very properly) was made over
the treasure trove. Of course, cries the reader, it was kept in its
original covers, with all the interesting associations of its early
state untouched? No such thing! Instead of making a suitable case, in
which it could be preserved just as it was, it was placed in the hands
of a well-known London binder, with the order, “Whole bind in velvet.”
He did his best, and the volume now glows luxuriously in its gilt edges
and its inappropriate covering, and, alas! with half-an-inch of its
uncut margin taken off all round. How do I know that? because the
clever binder, seeing some MS. remarks on one of the margins, turned
the leaf down to avoid cutting them off, and that stern witness will
always testify, to the observant reader, the original size of the book.
This same binder, on another occasion, placed a unique fifteenth century
Indulgence in warm water, to separate it from the cover upon which it
was pasted, the result being that, when dry, it was so distorted as to
be useless. That man soon after passed to another world, where, we may
hope, his works have not followed him, and that his merits as a good
citizen and an honest man counterbalanced his de-merits as a binder.
Other similar instances will occur to the memory of many a reader,
and doubtless the same sin will be committed from time to time by
certain binders, who seem to have an ingrained antipathy to rough edges
and large margins, which of course are, in their view, made by Nature as
food for the shaving tub.
De Rome, a celebrated bookbinder of the eighteenth century, who was
nicknamed by Dibdin “The Great Cropper,” was, although in private life
an estimable man, much addicted to the vice of reducing the margins of
all books sent to him to bind. So far did he go, that he even spared
not a fine copy of Froissart’s Chronicles, on vellum, in which was the
autograph of the well-known book-lover, De Thou, but cropped it most
cruelly.
Owners, too, have occasionally diseased minds with regard to
margins. A friend writes: “Your amusing anecdotes have brought to my
memory several biblioclasts whom I have known. One roughly cut the
margins off his books with a knife, hacking away very much like a hedger
and ditcher. Large paper volumes were his especial delight, as they
gave more paper. The slips thus obtained were used for index-making!
Another, with the bump of order unnaturally developed, had his folios
and quartos all reduced, in binding, to one size, so that they might
look even on his bookshelves.”
This latter was, doubtless, cousin to him who deliberately cut down
all his books close to the text, because he had been several times
annoyed by readers who made marginal notes.
The indignities, too, suffered by some books in their lettering!
Fancy an early black-letter fifteenth-century quarto on Knighthood,
labelled “Tracts”; or a translation of Virgil, “Sermons”! The “Histories
of Troy,” printed by Caxton, still exists with “Eracles” on the back, as
its title, because that name occurs several times in the early chapters,
and the binder was too proud to seek advice. The words “Miscellaneous,”
or “Old Pieces,” were sometimes used when binders were at a loss for
lettering, and many other instances might be mentioned.
The rapid spread of printing throughout Europe in the latter part of
the fifteenth century caused a great fall in the value of plain
un-illuminated MSS., and the immediate consequence of this was the
destruction of numerous volumes written upon parchment, which were used
by the binders to strengthen the backs of their newly-printed rivals.
These slips of vellum or parchment are quite common in old books.
Sometimes whole sheets are used as fly-leaves, and often reveal the
existence of most valuable works, unknown before—proving, at the same
time, the small value formerly attached to them.
Many a bibliographer, while examining old books, has to his great
puzzlement come across short slips of parchment, nearly always from some
old manuscript, sticking out like “guards” from the midst of the
leaves. These suggest, at first, imperfections or damage done to the
volume; but if examined closely it will be found that they are always in
the middle of a paper section, and the real reason of their existence is
just the same as when two leaves of parchment occur here and there in a
paper volume, viz.: strength—strength to resist the lug which the strong
thread makes against the middle of each section. These slips represent
old books destroyed, and like the slips already noticed, should always
be carefully examined.
When valuable books have been evil-entreated, when they have become
soiled by dirty hands, or spoiled by water stains, or injured by grease
spots, nothing is more astonishing to the uninitiated than the
transformation they undergo in the hands of a skilful restorer. The
covers are first carefully dissected, the eye of the operator keeping a
careful outlook for any fragments of old MSS. or early printed books,
which may have been used by the original binder. No force should be
applied to separate parts which adhere together; a little warm water and
care is sure to overcome that difficulty. When all the sections are
loose, the separate sheets are placed singly in a bath of cold water,
and allowed to remain there until all the dirt has soaked out. If not
sufficiently purified, a little hydrochloric or oxalic acid, or caustic
potash may be put in the water, according as the stains are from grease
or from ink. Here is where an unpractised binder will probably injure a
book for life. If the chemicals are too strong, or the sheets remain
too long in the bath, or are not thoroughly cleansed from the bleach
before they are re-sized, the certain seeds of decay are planted in the
paper, and although for a time the leaves may look bright to the eye,
and even crackle under the hand like the soundest paper, yet in the
course of a few years the enemy will appear, the fibre will decay, and
the existence of the books will terminate in a state of white tinder.
Everything which diminishes the interest of a book is inimical to its
preservation, and in fact is its enemy. Therefore, a few words upon the
destruction of old bindings.
I remember purchasing many years ago at a suburban book stall, a
perfect copy of Moxon’s Mechanic Exercises, now a scarce work. The
volumes were uncut, and had the original marble covers. They looked so
attractive in their old fashioned dress, that I at once determined to
preserve it. My binder soon made for them a neat wooden box in the
shape of a book, with morocco back properly lettered, where I trust the
originals will be preserved from dust and injury for many a long year.
Old covers, whether boards or paper, should always be retained if in
any state approaching decency. A case, which can be embellished to any
extent looks every whit as well upon the shelf! and gives even greater
protection than binding. It has also this great advantage: it does not
deprive your descendants of the opportunity of seeing for themselves
exactly in what dress the book buyers of four centuries ago received
their volumes.
|









 |