Other Vermin
By William Blades
BESIDES the worm I do not think there is any insect enemy of books worth
description. The domestic black-beetle, or cockroach, is far too modern
an introduction to our country to have done much harm, though he will
sometimes nibble the binding of books, especially if they rest upon the
floor.
Not so fortunate, however, are our American cousins, for in the
“Library Journal” for September, 1879, Mr. Weston Flint gives an account
of a dreadful little pest which commits great havoc upon the cloth
bindings of the New York libraries. It is a small black-beetle or
cockroach, called by scientists “Blatta germanica” and by others the
“Croton Bug.” Unlike our household pest, whose home is the kitchen, and
whose bashfulness loves secrecy and the dark hours, this misgrown flat
species, of which it would take two to make a medium-sized English
specimen, has gained in impudence what it has lost in size, fearing
neither light nor noise, neither man nor beast. In the old English
Bible of 1551, we read in Psalm xci, 5, “Thou shalt not nede to be
afraied for eny Bugges by night.” This verse falls unheeded on the ear
of the Western librarian who fears his “bugs” both night and day, for
they crawl over everything in broad sunlight, infesting and infecting
each corner and cranny of the bookshelves they choose as their home.
There is a remedy in the powder known as insecticide, which, however, is
very disagreeable upon books and shelves. It is, nevertheless, very
fatal to these pests, and affords some consolation in the fact that so
soon as a “bug” shows any signs of illness, he is devoured at once by
his voracious brethren with the same relish as if he were made of fresh
paste.
There is, too, a small silvery insect (Lepisma) which I have often
seen in the backs of neglected books, but his ravages are not of much
importance.
Nor can we reckon the Codfish as very dangerous to literature,
unless, indeed, he be of the Roman obedience, like that wonderful
Ichthiobibliophage (pardon me, Professor Owen) who, in the year 1626,
swallowed three Puritanical treatises of John Frith, the Protestant
martyr. No wonder, after such a meal, he was soon caught, and became
famous in the annals of literature. The following is the title of a
little book issued upon the occasion: “Vox Piscis, or the Book-Fish
containing Three Treatises, which were found in the belly of a Cod-Fish
in Cambridge Market on Midsummer Eve, AD 1626.” Lowndes says (see under
“Tracey,”) “great was the consternation at Cambridge upon the
publication of this work.”
Rats and mice, however, are occasionally very destructive, as the
following anecdote will show: Two centuries ago, the library of the
Dean and Chapter of Westminster was kept in the Chapter House, and
repairs having become necessary in that building, a scaffolding was
erected inside, the books being left on their shelves. One of the holes
made in the wall for a scaffold-pole was selected by a pair of rats for
their family residence. Here they formed a nest for their young ones by
descending to the library shelves and biting away the leaves of various
books. Snug and comfortable was the little household, until, one day,
the builder’s men having finished, the poles were removed, and— alas!
for the rats—the hole was closed up with bricks and cement. Buried
alive, the father and mother, with five or six of their offspring, met
with a speedy death, and not until a few years ago, when a restoration
of the Chapter House was effected, was the rat grave opened again for a
scaffold pole, and all their skeletons and their nest discovered. Their
bones and paper fragments of the nest may now be seen in a glass case in
the Chapter House, some of the fragments being attributed to books from
the press of Caxton. This is not the case, although there are pieces of
very early black-letter books not now to be found in the Abbey library,
including little bits of the famous Queen Elizabeth’s Prayer book, with
woodcuts, 1568.
A friend sends me the following incident: “A few years since, some
rats made nests in the trees surrounding my house; from thence they
jumped on to some flat roofing, and so made their way down a chimney
into a room where I kept books. A number of these, with parchment
backs, they entirely destroyed, as well as some half-dozen books whole
bound in parchment.”
Another friend informs me that in the Natural History Museum of the
Devon and Exeter Institution is a specimen of “another little pest,
which has a great affection for bindings in calf and roan. Its
scientific name is Niptus Hololeucos.” He adds, “Are you aware that
there was a terrible creature allied to these, rejoicing in the name of
Tomicus Typographus, which committed sad ravages in Germany in the
seventeenth century, and in the old liturgies of that country is
formally mentioned under its vulgar name, ‘The Turk’?” (See Kirby and
Spence, Seventh Edition, 1858, p. 123.) This is curious, and I did not
know it, although I know well that Typographus Tomicus, or the “cutting
printer,” is a sad enemy of (good) books. Upon this part of our
subject, however, I am debarred entering.
The following is from W. J. Westbrook, Mus. Doe., Cantab., and
represents ravages with which I am personally unacquainted:
“Dear Blades,--I send you an example of the ‘enemy’-mosity of an
ordinary housefly. It hid behind the paper, emitted some caustic fluid,
and then departed this life. I have often caught them in such holes.’
30/12/83.” The damage is an oblong hole, surrounded by a white fluffy
glaze (fungoid?), difficult to represent in a woodcut. The size here
given is exact.
|









 |